When does Appearance Reach Impropiety?

I would think most normal citizens, in the same situation, would just see the appearance of this as being a problem.  It certainly is not the kind of appearance that one who speaks of ‘changing Washington’ would be looking for. 

So does this speak of naivety; of having been exposed to such for too long to realize the issue; or does it speak of a level of official arrogance?  Or some combination?  That, I think, should be determined before Barack Obama becomes President.

4 Responses to “When does Appearance Reach Impropiety?”

  1. This is the most serious charge agaisnt Obama to date. All that preacher, muslim, rezko stuff is baseless.

  2. Rezko is hardly baseless; not well defined, but the real estate deal sure raises the same kind of eyebrows as this earmark does.

    The preacher stuff; not so much so, though Barack needs to make clear his strong disagreement with a lot of the Preacher’s rantings.

  3. I find guilt by association arguments to be the least convincing of political gossip charges. The preacher stuff is nonsense. Dave Nate is right that this is the first real corruption-esque charge against Obama, and the most serious allegation. Whomever preaches at his church matters little to me. But what Obama did in office does.

  4. [...] with Rezco was innocent and does not taint Barack.  They haven’t addressed the issue yet about the million dollar earmark for his wife’s employer, which gave her a 261% annual raise right after….  But, however this and the other issues pan out, Obama looks a lot less like a political Messiah, [...]

Leave a Reply