The Death of Freddie and Fannie

The United States is not a capitalist nation. The government refuses to let the two biggest lenders to new homeowners fail because the government is just “too big to fail” at any given point. Fannie and Freddie are getting a bailout and it is a bad policy decision on the side of the White House (who pushed for the bailout). This accomplishes several things, among them the bailout of the speculators involved in the housing market, allowing them to slowly take thier money out and put it somewhere else; a public image of “saving” the economy; and lastly the government is ensuring a bigger, harder financial crash in the future.

Ludwig von Mises wrote that government intervention never works. It will only create more problems. Once these problems are identified, there are only two courses of action–get the government out of the economy, or let the government intervene more. Once the government intervenes more, it will create more problems, etc. and etc., until the government controls the entire economy. This is why middle-ground does not work and why a choice between pure laissez faire capitalism and complete totalitarian socialism must be made at some point.

The perfect example of government intervention (and of Mises’ theory)  right now is the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac debacle. For years the fascist New Deal program (Fannie Mae) has been surviving on government inflation and low interest loans spurred on by the Federal Reserve. In a market without a central bank artificially devaluing the money supply, Fannie Mae nor Freddie Mac could have ever lasted this long. It was the strength of the American economy that kept these two institutions afloat, but only as the government intervened to force lenders to lend to horribly unqualified borrowers. The affects are coming back to bite us and we see the government trying to stave off this inevitable crash.

The two institutions will fail, as all large government endeavors fail. Everything the government does results in failure because it cannot be as efficient as the free market can. Analysts are surprised at this, for government is supposed to be “too big to fail”. Karen DeCoster writes:

Bloomberg analysts appeared to be perplexed that both companies are ranked Aaa by the credit-rating oligopoly, yet derivatives traders were trading both at levels that implied a credit rating at least five levels lower.

Credit ratings by the government-granted oligopolists are not the market; trading actions based on actual knowledge and/or informed interpretations of known events are the market. The act of trading credit-default swaps (tied to debt sold by Fannie and Freddie) does not hinge on implied promises on the part of the government. Sure, implied government backing has caused the security prices to be skewed for Fannie and Freddie. But what’s happening here is that the market participants, in spite of an implicit government guarantee, are coming to their senses and realizing the insolvency and of both Fannie and Freddie.

I suppose these same individuals are convinced that the Federal Reserve and the banking industry can’t fail either because of the FDIC. That is incorrect, too. FDIC is on the verge of failure if enough banks were to collapse at once. It is the natural course of the market to have bank runs when there is suspicion of insolvent, bankrupt banks, as we saw with Northern Rock in the UK.

The government must let the banking industry fail if that is the course of things. In America, every small business is allowed to fail. Even Enron and MCI-WorldCom can fail. But the dirty secret is that the banking industry “must not fail”. That is a pack of lies that must be beaten down. The truth is, our government has a choice: it can let the banks fail and make this recession quick, or it can prevent the downfall and guarantee a harder, more lasting crash in the future. If Hoover and FDR had not intervened in the economy in 1929-1934, the recession could have lasted only a year or two, as Murray Rothbard pointed out in his book “America’s Great Depression“. I suspect the government will choose the interventionist rout and we will be made to suffer the effects of massive inflation and a prolonged depression. That is the way of governments.

5 Responses to “The Death of Freddie and Fannie”

  1. What the markets and foreign investors built up, they can knock down; no matter how much federal cash pours into the system. This will probably touch of a wave of bank failures as the ‘little guys’ realize there will be no help for them.

    When the rest of the world banks move against the Fed and Wall Street, the crash will be resounding.

  2. Even with this bailout, a headline on Drudge says that 150 other banks will fail this year.

    That’s about one every other day. As a variety of the water torture, there should be some interesting political effects.

  3. Quite. I look forward to the failure of the banking system–it is kept aloof by government laws. True free markets have a check on fractional reserve banking called bank runs. The government steps in, allies with the banks, and tries to make runs illegal. This is what caused the small depressions we had in the 1800s and early 1900s, but the bankers finally started getting smart in 1913-1933.

  4. John McCain is a fascist.

    “Those institutions, Fannie and Freddie, have been responsible for millions of Americans to be able to own their own homes, and they will not fail, we will not allow them to fail … we will do what’s necessary to make sure that they continue that function.”

  5. Immoral is not a strong enough word for those involved in fractional reserve banking. Nor is it a strong enough word for those in government who are power mongers.
    But they cannot outrun the laws of economics. Nor the laws of God. Eventually……

Leave a Reply