<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Political Inquirer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalinquirer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalinquirer.com</link>
	<description>Bringing the latest news, wittiest commentary, and the best bloggers to the Internet. Brilliantly planned, perfectly executed--the Inquirer of Politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 08:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Israel&#8217;s events - World War III in the making? by hello</title>
		<link>http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/03/07/israels-events-world-war-iii-in-the-making/#comment-12790</link>
		<dc:creator>hello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 03:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inquirer.wordpress.com/?p=1420#comment-12790</guid>
		<description>gay dum</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gay dum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Israel&#8217;s events - World War III in the making? by hello</title>
		<link>http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/03/07/israels-events-world-war-iii-in-the-making/#comment-12789</link>
		<dc:creator>hello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 03:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inquirer.wordpress.com/?p=1420#comment-12789</guid>
		<description>ur dum</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ur dum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Upcoming Stagflation; brought to you by…. The Average American by Ryan</title>
		<link>http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/05/11/the-upcoming-stagflation-brought-to-you-by%e2%80%a6-the-average-american/#comment-12786</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 02:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inquirer.wordpress.com/?p=2167#comment-12786</guid>
		<description>And why wouldn't the average Americans vote for these fiscal spenders?  As my parents always says "one day you'll see those tax dollars taken out of your paycheck, then you'll understand."

Of course, they failed to mention that 'those tax dollars' will include the ones I'm paying to make up for their tax cuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And why wouldn&#8217;t the average Americans vote for these fiscal spenders?  As my parents always says &#8220;one day you&#8217;ll see those tax dollars taken out of your paycheck, then you&#8217;ll understand.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, they failed to mention that &#8216;those tax dollars&#8217; will include the ones I&#8217;m paying to make up for their tax cuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Non Pledge of Allegiance by Mike O</title>
		<link>http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/05/09/the-non-pledge-of-allegiance/#comment-12784</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 02:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inquirer.wordpress.com/?p=2157#comment-12784</guid>
		<description>Ryan: 'In God We Trust' has been on money from the get-go.  I, for one, trust in God a heck of a lot more than the government; right now, those words just might be all that keeps out currency to be usable as toilet paper (ala Zimbabwe).  

All sorts of reference to God by our Founding Fathers, in their documents, on and on.  The &lt;b&gt;exclusion&lt;/b&gt; of references to God is what is new.  The right is after all, freedom &lt;b&gt;of&lt;/b&gt; religon, and I have not seen anybody kicked out of school for passing on the 'under God' piece of the Pledge.

I am still looking for this right to political correctness some seem to think exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan: &#8216;In God We Trust&#8217; has been on money from the get-go.  I, for one, trust in God a heck of a lot more than the government; right now, those words just might be all that keeps out currency to be usable as toilet paper (ala Zimbabwe).  </p>
<p>All sorts of reference to God by our Founding Fathers, in their documents, on and on.  The <b>exclusion</b> of references to God is what is new.  The right is after all, freedom <b>of</b> religon, and I have not seen anybody kicked out of school for passing on the &#8216;under God&#8217; piece of the Pledge.</p>
<p>I am still looking for this right to political correctness some seem to think exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hillary is Dead, in the Media&#8217;s Eyes by Mike O</title>
		<link>http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/05/11/hillary-is-dead-in-the-medias-eyes/#comment-12783</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 01:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inquirer.wordpress.com/?p=2166#comment-12783</guid>
		<description>Expect Hillary's margins in the next few states to be embarrasingly large.  People in those states won't like to be told by the MSM that they're votes don't matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expect Hillary&#8217;s margins in the next few states to be embarrasingly large.  People in those states won&#8217;t like to be told by the MSM that they&#8217;re votes don&#8217;t matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Non Pledge of Allegiance by Ryan</title>
		<link>http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/05/09/the-non-pledge-of-allegiance/#comment-12781</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 01:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inquirer.wordpress.com/?p=2157#comment-12781</guid>
		<description>It's a bit disturbing that everyone shrugs off the "under God" part. It's easy to point at atheists and say "who else even cares?" but I think the founding fathers would.  Part of the motivation for many pilgrims and settlers coming to America was religious persecution.  Saying, "Oh, well gee, atheists don't count because they're non-religious" doesn't cut it.  Once you make exceptions for one 'unpopular' group, then the rights are meaningless.  

Plus, "under God" was only added to the pledge in the 1950's and it was added specifically for religious effect:

"The Knights of Columbus in New York City felt that the pledge was incomplete without any reference to a deity."

From wiki's page on the pledge:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a bit disturbing that everyone shrugs off the &#8220;under God&#8221; part. It&#8217;s easy to point at atheists and say &#8220;who else even cares?&#8221; but I think the founding fathers would.  Part of the motivation for many pilgrims and settlers coming to America was religious persecution.  Saying, &#8220;Oh, well gee, atheists don&#8217;t count because they&#8217;re non-religious&#8221; doesn&#8217;t cut it.  Once you make exceptions for one &#8216;unpopular&#8217; group, then the rights are meaningless.  </p>
<p>Plus, &#8220;under God&#8221; was only added to the pledge in the 1950&#8217;s and it was added specifically for religious effect:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Knights of Columbus in New York City felt that the pledge was incomplete without any reference to a deity.&#8221;</p>
<p>From wiki&#8217;s page on the pledge:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Demise of Smalltown Police by Rad Geek</title>
		<link>http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/05/11/the-demise-of-smalltown-police/#comment-12779</link>
		<dc:creator>Rad Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 17:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inquirer.wordpress.com/?p=2163#comment-12779</guid>
		<description>Norm,

I'm sure that there are some drug cartels paying off cops somewhere; that's what underground business operations tend to do. But as far as the topic of discussion goes -- that is, the increasing aggressiveness and militarization of local police forces -- the really payoffs here are coming from none other than the United States federal government, which has spent the past few decades as the prime sponsor, trainer, and supplier for paramilitary SWAT squads, "elite" task forces, and local patrol cops, through the mechanism of tax-funded federal grants, special training seminars and collaboration initiatives with federal law enforcement agencies, surplus equipment sales, etc. And while counter-terrorism and other so-called "Homeland Security" projects are now a driving factor in this process, the &lt;em&gt;chief&lt;/em&gt; driving factor, over the past 30-40 years, has been the War on Drugs itself. If you want an explanation of why small-town police are increasingly trained to be belligerent, have the equipment and the desire to conduct paramilitary SWAT raids at the drop of a hat, are taking on larger and more powerful assault weapons just for ordinary patrols, and generally act like a case study of collective roid rage, it's precisely because the Federalis have been juicing them for the past 30-40 years in order to use them as foot soldiers in the enforcement of federal drug policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norm,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that there are some drug cartels paying off cops somewhere; that&#8217;s what underground business operations tend to do. But as far as the topic of discussion goes &#8212; that is, the increasing aggressiveness and militarization of local police forces &#8212; the really payoffs here are coming from none other than the United States federal government, which has spent the past few decades as the prime sponsor, trainer, and supplier for paramilitary SWAT squads, &#8220;elite&#8221; task forces, and local patrol cops, through the mechanism of tax-funded federal grants, special training seminars and collaboration initiatives with federal law enforcement agencies, surplus equipment sales, etc. And while counter-terrorism and other so-called &#8220;Homeland Security&#8221; projects are now a driving factor in this process, the <em>chief</em> driving factor, over the past 30-40 years, has been the War on Drugs itself. If you want an explanation of why small-town police are increasingly trained to be belligerent, have the equipment and the desire to conduct paramilitary SWAT raids at the drop of a hat, are taking on larger and more powerful assault weapons just for ordinary patrols, and generally act like a case study of collective roid rage, it&#8217;s precisely because the Federalis have been juicing them for the past 30-40 years in order to use them as foot soldiers in the enforcement of federal drug policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obamas&#8217; Salaries and Senate Seat&#8211;Coincidence? by Mike O</title>
		<link>http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/05/11/obamas-salaries-and-senate-seat-coincidence/#comment-12778</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 16:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inquirer.wordpress.com/?p=2165#comment-12778</guid>
		<description>Uhh, Lance; don't you read this site?  &lt;a href="http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/03/13/when-does-appearance-reach-impropiety/" rel="nofollow"&gt;I posted on this a long time ago&lt;/a&gt;.  Old news, friend, for those of us who have taken Obam's campaign seriously for some time.  It certainly does NOT remove it as discussion-worthy, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhh, Lance; don&#8217;t you read this site?  <a href="http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/03/13/when-does-appearance-reach-impropiety/" rel="nofollow">I posted on this a long time ago</a>.  Old news, friend, for those of us who have taken Obam&#8217;s campaign seriously for some time.  It certainly does NOT remove it as discussion-worthy, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Demise of Smalltown Police by Mike O</title>
		<link>http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/05/11/the-demise-of-smalltown-police/#comment-12777</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 16:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inquirer.wordpress.com/?p=2163#comment-12777</guid>
		<description>I would not be comparing to European police, however.  Look at the Paris situation, where scores of cars still are torched at night and there are huge swaths of 'no-go' zones for the police, who are pretty corrupt themselves in the drug area.

I smell that Lance may be a disgruntled leadfoot.  :D
Sorry, but the last time I took a speeding ticket (been a few years), I shrugged it off and went through the process.  The law is what it is, it supposedly is for safety and the punishment is just a minor inconvenience (unless you're dumb enough not to learn the lesson.)

As for a revolution now; you make me laugh.  Revolution takes personal sacrifice, putting one's cause well above ones' comfort.  I see no such tendency or drive behind the squeakiest of wheels, here or elsewhere.  Whining is as far as it goes, to avoid the personal inconvenience of actually doing something.  

I see the same so much in those who say, 'Oh we have to help the poor people in Africa'; and you all know what I think of that is the Nike slogon ('&lt;a href="http://mzungumike.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Just do it&lt;/a&gt;'). And that, dear friends, is far easier than any revolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not be comparing to European police, however.  Look at the Paris situation, where scores of cars still are torched at night and there are huge swaths of &#8216;no-go&#8217; zones for the police, who are pretty corrupt themselves in the drug area.</p>
<p>I smell that Lance may be a disgruntled leadfoot.  :D<br />
Sorry, but the last time I took a speeding ticket (been a few years), I shrugged it off and went through the process.  The law is what it is, it supposedly is for safety and the punishment is just a minor inconvenience (unless you&#8217;re dumb enough not to learn the lesson.)</p>
<p>As for a revolution now; you make me laugh.  Revolution takes personal sacrifice, putting one&#8217;s cause well above ones&#8217; comfort.  I see no such tendency or drive behind the squeakiest of wheels, here or elsewhere.  Whining is as far as it goes, to avoid the personal inconvenience of actually doing something.  </p>
<p>I see the same so much in those who say, &#8216;Oh we have to help the poor people in Africa&#8217;; and you all know what I think of that is the Nike slogon (&#8217;<a href="http://mzungumike.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">Just do it</a>&#8216;). And that, dear friends, is far easier than any revolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barack Obama and Colin Powell would be an unstoppable team by Mike O</title>
		<link>http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/03/13/barack-obama-and-colin-powell-would-be-an-unstoppable-team/#comment-12776</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 16:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalinquirer.com/?p=1537#comment-12776</guid>
		<description>Jack, the 'cause' is religious fanatism that cannot be assuaged without blood; a fanaticism that goes back many decades.  Did freeing a muslim country while leaving the Muslim leader of the invafding country in power satisfy them.  Did bailing out the Muslims in Kosovo?  No, attacks on us continued.  These are people willing to kill over the naming of a teddy bear, who will only be satisfied with their 7th century ideas being followed to the letter.  

There were definitely errors in starting this war; that is a given, but hardly unheard of in history (uhh, Bosnia?).  However, from our side, it has been fought with a level of precision unheard of in previous wars.  Those bombs we drop?  Precision guided munitions that will take out a single building and leave the one next door standing.  The civilian casualties caused by us are, in a large part, due to the other side surrounding themselves with civilians before they attack, while we try to clear them out and take many casualties holding fire for their sake.  Jack, if you can't see the moral difference, it's only because you sit in this country in comfort and have never had to face such yourself.

let me given you a couple links that may give you a little clarity, from someone who is independent and seen this stuff in person:
&lt;a href="http://www.michaelyon-online.com/index.php?option=com_content&#38;view=article&#38;id=276:the-hands-of-god&#38;catid=63:archive-2007&#38;Itemid=108" rel="nofollow"&gt;A real martyr&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.michaelyon-online.com/index.php?option=com_content&#38;view=article&#38;id=325:al-qaeda-on-the-run-feasting-on-the-moveable-beast&#38;catid=63:archive-2007&#38;Itemid=108" rel="nofollow"&gt;The 1920s Brigade saw both sides of the issue and made their choice.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, the &#8217;cause&#8217; is religious fanatism that cannot be assuaged without blood; a fanaticism that goes back many decades.  Did freeing a muslim country while leaving the Muslim leader of the invafding country in power satisfy them.  Did bailing out the Muslims in Kosovo?  No, attacks on us continued.  These are people willing to kill over the naming of a teddy bear, who will only be satisfied with their 7th century ideas being followed to the letter.  </p>
<p>There were definitely errors in starting this war; that is a given, but hardly unheard of in history (uhh, Bosnia?).  However, from our side, it has been fought with a level of precision unheard of in previous wars.  Those bombs we drop?  Precision guided munitions that will take out a single building and leave the one next door standing.  The civilian casualties caused by us are, in a large part, due to the other side surrounding themselves with civilians before they attack, while we try to clear them out and take many casualties holding fire for their sake.  Jack, if you can&#8217;t see the moral difference, it&#8217;s only because you sit in this country in comfort and have never had to face such yourself.</p>
<p>let me given you a couple links that may give you a little clarity, from someone who is independent and seen this stuff in person:<br />
<a href="http://www.michaelyon-online.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=276:the-hands-of-god&amp;catid=63:archive-2007&amp;Itemid=108" rel="nofollow">A real martyr</a><br />
<a href="http://www.michaelyon-online.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=325:al-qaeda-on-the-run-feasting-on-the-moveable-beast&amp;catid=63:archive-2007&amp;Itemid=108" rel="nofollow">The 1920s Brigade saw both sides of the issue and made their choice.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
