The Political Inquirer

The One shall Lead the Progressive Bullies

The Far Left, or for those who are attempting to change our cultural language, Progressives, are not interested in any political compromise. Whatever made anyone think that someone from the Far Left (Progressives) wants to sit down and discuss any form of compromise or fair negotiation, let alone cooperation.  Hell, They can’t even get along with each other. What on earth makes anyone think they can negotiate or bargain though any type of reasonable agreement? These folks would rather pretend some phony astonishment at the presentation and then use the press to vilify and malign anyone who does not think like they do.

And they use threats against those who would express their political thought publicly. Oh yes, I write locally for my local newspaper and even that can be dicey at times. They’ll spit on you in public and email you veiled threats. They will stand on the perimeter, using a tempered posture while they stare hard at you. Oh, they clearly want you to feel their presence. These people want to bully you into shutting your mouth, curtailing any idea of Free Speech. That is why the Second Amendment in our Bill of Rights scares them so much.

It is the Second Amendment that protects the First Amendment, not only for the written word, but the individual’s spoken word. Yet, what is worse, is having to deal with those carefully written intimidations that cause you to wonder if your family is included.

And these poor far left cracked sillies are willing to blame one for just about anything! I have been accused of blaming the Democrats for low crop yield. I have even been condemned for blaming the Democrats for the Viking’s losses this season. Yes, I thought you’d like that one.

Of course, there is the usual expected attack on my ability to use my manhood and that I should use toilet paper to wipe my mouth every time I speak my mind.

So, what do these threats really mean?

Ask 22-year-old Kwame Dancy, who was killed after receiving a twitter threat: “Stop XXXXX retweetin XXXXX before I make it to where u can’t wlk through my block…” My most recent threat was sent via email: “Good luck tomorrow and good luck walking”.   So, what is the difference here.     Well, I am still living while Kwame Dancy is gone.

Overblown ego, bravado, and hate did in Dancy I suppose. My threats to my person and family are strictly from the political genre. But the threats are indeed similar with the local police unable to do anything, unless the threat is specific in its words.

Just writing “Good luck tomorrow and good luck walking” and “before I make it to where you can’t wlk through my block” are not specific enough to use in a court of law to deal with the individual making the threat.     The police can’t even talk to the guy making the threat. Now, if something like assault or murder should follow such words (like in Dancy’s case), then and only then the intent of hazard transforms for the police and court.

The man arrested in Dancy’s murder is now being charged with Internet Threat, —after the event.   So much for protection and prevention of major crime?

So, we are now left wondering if the creepy similarities in threatening language should be taken somewhat seriously.    Well, it was on this end, however the police were quick to note that though they personally perceived it threatening, their hands were tied by law and the judges. Judges want the language specific, like legislative law, or no bench warrant can be issued. With no warrant, any police visit can be viewed in court later as harassment. Again, it sounds like we are protecting the rights of the veiled villain as opposed to the approximate victim these threats go too?

What is worse is that one name was used in an email threat. However, no one can be found with that name within a three hour drive. The rest are unknown. Email technology at its best or worst depending which side of the threat you stand on. Even with friends looking into the threat, good friends in high places mind you, nothing can be done about the email threats so far received or to the individuals who may have sent them.

More or less, this conservative is on his own for his own protection.   I have chosen to stand by my Second Amendment Rights and to utilize them to the best of my own abilities.    I have taken my State’s Right to Carry Law Course and fulfilled its obligations and requirements.   Now, they can threaten all they want. I am prepared to defend home and castle, family and person. I am also prepared to meet any physical assault.

Take that you Far Left Progressive Bullies, and chew on it real hard.